Review




Structured Review

INFINIUM Inc array processing workflow
<t>Infinium</t> BeadChip performance in ultra-low input ranges. ( A ) A summary table of workflows used in this study. <t>Workflow</t> A is the Illumina standard workflow. ( B ) Box plots were used to visualize the probe success rates (top) and the F1 score (bottom). The number of samples for each experiment was displayed next to each box. (C, D) Comparison of four main preparation methods based on ( C ) probe success rate and ( D ) F1 score. The number on the top right corner of each tile indicates the number of samples analyzed in each experiment. See also . (E, F) Smooth scatterplots for the comparison of workflows A, C, J, and M with ( E ) 2 ng and ( F ) 0.5 ng of DNA input ( R : spearman's rho, P : P -value). The dashed squares indicate intermediate beta values (0.25–0.75) on both axes.
Array Processing Workflow, supplied by INFINIUM Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/array processing workflow/product/INFINIUM Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
array processing workflow - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Low-input and single-cell methods for Infinium DNA methylation BeadChips"

Article Title: Low-input and single-cell methods for Infinium DNA methylation BeadChips

Journal: Nucleic Acids Research

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae127

Infinium BeadChip performance in ultra-low input ranges. ( A ) A summary table of workflows used in this study. Workflow A is the Illumina standard workflow. ( B ) Box plots were used to visualize the probe success rates (top) and the F1 score (bottom). The number of samples for each experiment was displayed next to each box. (C, D) Comparison of four main preparation methods based on ( C ) probe success rate and ( D ) F1 score. The number on the top right corner of each tile indicates the number of samples analyzed in each experiment. See also . (E, F) Smooth scatterplots for the comparison of workflows A, C, J, and M with ( E ) 2 ng and ( F ) 0.5 ng of DNA input ( R : spearman's rho, P : P -value). The dashed squares indicate intermediate beta values (0.25–0.75) on both axes.
Figure Legend Snippet: Infinium BeadChip performance in ultra-low input ranges. ( A ) A summary table of workflows used in this study. Workflow A is the Illumina standard workflow. ( B ) Box plots were used to visualize the probe success rates (top) and the F1 score (bottom). The number of samples for each experiment was displayed next to each box. (C, D) Comparison of four main preparation methods based on ( C ) probe success rate and ( D ) F1 score. The number on the top right corner of each tile indicates the number of samples analyzed in each experiment. See also . (E, F) Smooth scatterplots for the comparison of workflows A, C, J, and M with ( E ) 2 ng and ( F ) 0.5 ng of DNA input ( R : spearman's rho, P : P -value). The dashed squares indicate intermediate beta values (0.25–0.75) on both axes.

Techniques Used: Comparison



Similar Products

90
INFINIUM Inc array processing workflow
<t>Infinium</t> BeadChip performance in ultra-low input ranges. ( A ) A summary table of workflows used in this study. <t>Workflow</t> A is the Illumina standard workflow. ( B ) Box plots were used to visualize the probe success rates (top) and the F1 score (bottom). The number of samples for each experiment was displayed next to each box. (C, D) Comparison of four main preparation methods based on ( C ) probe success rate and ( D ) F1 score. The number on the top right corner of each tile indicates the number of samples analyzed in each experiment. See also . (E, F) Smooth scatterplots for the comparison of workflows A, C, J, and M with ( E ) 2 ng and ( F ) 0.5 ng of DNA input ( R : spearman's rho, P : P -value). The dashed squares indicate intermediate beta values (0.25–0.75) on both axes.
Array Processing Workflow, supplied by INFINIUM Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/array processing workflow/product/INFINIUM Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
array processing workflow - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Thermo Fisher genetitan system array plate processing workflow
<t>Infinium</t> BeadChip performance in ultra-low input ranges. ( A ) A summary table of workflows used in this study. <t>Workflow</t> A is the Illumina standard workflow. ( B ) Box plots were used to visualize the probe success rates (top) and the F1 score (bottom). The number of samples for each experiment was displayed next to each box. (C, D) Comparison of four main preparation methods based on ( C ) probe success rate and ( D ) F1 score. The number on the top right corner of each tile indicates the number of samples analyzed in each experiment. See also . (E, F) Smooth scatterplots for the comparison of workflows A, C, J, and M with ( E ) 2 ng and ( F ) 0.5 ng of DNA input ( R : spearman's rho, P : P -value). The dashed squares indicate intermediate beta values (0.25–0.75) on both axes.
Genetitan System Array Plate Processing Workflow, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/genetitan system array plate processing workflow/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
genetitan system array plate processing workflow - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Infinium BeadChip performance in ultra-low input ranges. ( A ) A summary table of workflows used in this study. Workflow A is the Illumina standard workflow. ( B ) Box plots were used to visualize the probe success rates (top) and the F1 score (bottom). The number of samples for each experiment was displayed next to each box. (C, D) Comparison of four main preparation methods based on ( C ) probe success rate and ( D ) F1 score. The number on the top right corner of each tile indicates the number of samples analyzed in each experiment. See also . (E, F) Smooth scatterplots for the comparison of workflows A, C, J, and M with ( E ) 2 ng and ( F ) 0.5 ng of DNA input ( R : spearman's rho, P : P -value). The dashed squares indicate intermediate beta values (0.25–0.75) on both axes.

Journal: Nucleic Acids Research

Article Title: Low-input and single-cell methods for Infinium DNA methylation BeadChips

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae127

Figure Lengend Snippet: Infinium BeadChip performance in ultra-low input ranges. ( A ) A summary table of workflows used in this study. Workflow A is the Illumina standard workflow. ( B ) Box plots were used to visualize the probe success rates (top) and the F1 score (bottom). The number of samples for each experiment was displayed next to each box. (C, D) Comparison of four main preparation methods based on ( C ) probe success rate and ( D ) F1 score. The number on the top right corner of each tile indicates the number of samples analyzed in each experiment. See also . (E, F) Smooth scatterplots for the comparison of workflows A, C, J, and M with ( E ) 2 ng and ( F ) 0.5 ng of DNA input ( R : spearman's rho, P : P -value). The dashed squares indicate intermediate beta values (0.25–0.75) on both axes.

Article Snippet: PGCs are typically present in low numbers, hindering their analysis by the standard Infinium array processing workflow ( ).

Techniques: Comparison